by Cezar » Fri Apr 06, 2012 1:50 pm
Dear user,
Theoretically, the number of folders that can be monitored on a network using BatchPhoto Monitor is unlimited. But if you are interested in execution speed, the optimal number of such folders is represented by the number of cores on your machine's processor (or the number of actual execution threads for processors with Hyper Threading). On the other hand, if you are more interested in efficiency, just multiply the previously mentioned optimal number by two and you get the number of folders that should be monitored in order to obtain the best productivity.
As for hardware specifications it is obvious that a machine with a multi-core processor would be recommended for optimal execution of BatchPhoto Enterprise.
Dear user,
Theoretically, the number of folders that can be monitored on a network using BatchPhoto Monitor is unlimited. But if you are interested in execution speed, the optimal number of such folders is represented by the number of cores on your machine's processor (or the number of actual execution threads for processors with Hyper Threading). On the other hand, if you are more interested in efficiency, just multiply the previously mentioned optimal number by two and you get the number of folders that should be monitored in order to obtain the best productivity.
As for hardware specifications it is obvious that a machine with a multi-core processor would be recommended for optimal execution of BatchPhoto Enterprise.